The British Caving Association

Any views expressed are not necessarily those of the BCA
It is currently Sat 20 Apr 2019 17:43

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri 15 Sep 2006 15:12 
Site Admin

Joined: Thu 29 Dec 2005 23:22
Posts: 298
Location: Axbridge, Somerset, UK
Footleg wrote:
1) Limiting SIDs to four digits assumes that there will be less than 10000 sites per county. I would suggest it safer to use five digits for future proofing the system.

As proposed the number was within area as well, so should have been plenty. However things have moved on, and I think you have intuitively assumed what is now the latest thinking. That is to remove the area code from the SID, so having a unique number within the county code. (If people wanted the mnemonic value of an area it could be optionally appended, but wouldn't contribute to the uniqueness of the SID)

The problem with the areas is that they would need to be defined, not easy. They also tend to change with time and fashion, also bad. At least the county boundaries are established and they don't change too rapidly.

Also counties like Devon don't really have area's with a sensible number of caves in them.

As to the number of digits, yes it needs to be longer. Lets say 5. That's 100 thousand sites within a county.

Dave Cooke
BCA Webmaster, BCA Web Services, National Cave Registry Co-ordinator, CSCC Treasurer

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1 post ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group